Corporatism as a Model of Government Management in Inclusion, Equality, and Gender Equity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52076/eacad-v5i1.531Keywords:
Corporatism; Gender equality; Equity social inclusion.Abstract
The article "Corporatism as a Model of Governmental Management in Gender Inclusion, Equality, and Equity" proposes a critical analysis of corporatism as a public management paradigm to promote inclusion, equality, and gender equity in society. The research, conducted within the Master's in Communication for Development and Project Management of development project program at the Catholic University of Mozambique, addresses the concept of cooperativism, its historical origins, and the guiding principles. The introduction emphasizes the social and academic relevance of the topics, underscoring the importance of understanding cooperativism as a governmental tool to address challenges such as discrimination, inequality, and gender-based violence. The text explains the theoretical basis of cooperation, tracing back to human history, and exploring the idea that unity enhances productivity. The section on cooperativism highlights its role in promoting economic and social development, emphasizing fundamental principles such as voluntary membership, democratic management, and economic participation of members. The connection of cooperativism to ideas of social justice and balance is discussed, highlighting its origin in the cooperative movement and its contributions to work organization. The article seeks to understand how governmental cooperatives in Mozambique can contribute to community development, mentioning specific laws and government programs. Social inclusion is presented as a concept that aims to integrate those who have been socially excluded, while gender equality and equity are discussed as essential requirements for a fair and balanced society. In the final considerations, the role of cooperativism in promoting equal opportunities and overcoming gender inequalities is highlighted. The article concludes by drawing attention to the need to promote inclusive and egalitarian attitudes to build a more equitable society.
References
Bialoskorski, N. S.(2006). Aspectos Econômicos das Cooperativas. Mandamentos. Booth, C., Colomb, G., & Williams, J. (2008). The Craft of Research. The University of Chicago Press.
Cançado, A. C., Serpa, S. A., & Pacífico Filho, M. (2014). Cooperativismo. Dicionário para a formação em Gestão social. Salvador: CIAGS/UFBA, 39-41. Estivill, J. (2003). Panorama da luta contra a exclusão social: conceitos e estratégias. Genebra: BIT,227.
Freire, S., & César, M. (2002). Evolution of the Portuguese special education system. A deaf child’s life in a regular school: is it possible to have hope?. Educational and Child Psychology, 19(2), 76-96.
Hamu, L., Mafra, J., & Hart, C. (1998). Exclusão e Inclusão social. http://www.brasilescola.com/educacao/inclusao-social.htm
Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Londres: SAGE Publications. Owen, R. (1828). Observations on the Effects of the Manufacturing System. Londres: Longman, Rees,
Santos, V. D.( 2000). Crescimento. Crise e Reestruturação da Cooperativa de Cafeicultores e Agropecuaristas de Maringá – COCAMAR. Dissertação
(Mestrado em Gestão dos Agronegócios). Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR, Umuarama/PR. www.unoescsmo.edu.br/pub/professores/farid_eid/dissertacaovaldemar.pdf.
Schneider, J. O. (2012). A doutrina do cooperativismo: análise do alcance, do sentido e da atualidade dos seus valores, princípios e normas nos tempos atuais. Cadernos Gestão Social, 3(2), 251-273.
Serpa, A. C., Cançado, A. C., & Filho, M. P. (2014). Cooperativismo. Dicionário para a formação em Gestão social. CIAGS/UFBA.
Stainback, S., Stainback, W., East, K., & Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). A commentary on inclusion and the development of a positive self-identity by people with disabilities.Exceptional Children, Londres.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF 60(6), 486-490.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alódia de Lurdes Nhaca; Benjamim Lucas Ernesto; Horácio Felisberto Caliche
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
